© DAVID CARR-SMITH 2009 : all images and text are copyrighted - please accredit text quotes - image repro must be negotiated via [email protected]
Key
F11 for full-screen on/off DAVID
CARR-SMITH - IMPROVISATION / DESIGN / ART / KITSCH / CHANCE
ALLOTMENT
IMPROVISATIONS
VENUES
FOR INDIVIDUAL INVENTIVENESS -
PUBLIC, LEGAL, SOCIALLY ENDORSED
Click on images to enlarge
AN
ARTIST'S PUBLIC-SITE INSTALLATION WORKS
.
IMPROVISED OPEN-SITE: ("THE NOMADIC COMMUNITY GARDEN")
IMPROVISED VILLAGES: (WANDSWORTH & KEW BRIDGE 'ECO VILLAGES')
ALLOTMENT IMPROVISATIONS - PUBLIC, LEGAL, SOCIALLY INDORSED
TEMPORARY-ARCHITECTURE: ("FRANK'S CAFE" & "SOUTHWARK LIDO")
VERNACULAR - PRAGMATISM & STYLE: (BERDUN VILLAGE BARNS & HOUSES)
"HOME"
- MY LOCATION VIA MASS-PRODUCTS & TASTE - LIV-RM
"HOME"
- MY LOCATION VIA MASS-PRODUCTS & TASTE - HOUSE
"HOME" - MY LOCATION VIA PERSONAL CHOICES
ART - GOTHIC INTO RENAISSANCE INTO EARLY 20thC
ART
- 20thC COLLAGE INTO MASS-MEDIA
GRAFFITI
INTO STREET-ART
KITSCH
CHANCE
& DESIGN
.
ALLOTMENT IMPROVISATIONS - p1
p1:
INTRODUCTION
p1:
"ONE TREE HILL" ALLOTMENT
.
Allotments present a myriad of invented and 'rubbish' objects that provoke one to examine the junction between improvisation, art, kitsch and chance. They are rich in practical and gratuitous inventions spanning a spectrum of needs that is as wide (albeit below the scale of homes) and more continuous than that which underlies our neurotically compartmentalised suburbs and cities. Allotments offer a plethora of structures and form-conjunctions for containing and protecting, light and heat collecting, growth-guiding, that though specialised for horticulture might be perceived as if 'sketches' and 'models' for aspects of possible town-scale architecture. They also exhibit chance-agglomerations that in the functionally specialised suburb or city would be physically obstructive or aesthetic anathema, but in the purposively simple environment of the allotment are contained in the pervasive aura of potential usefulness and physically bounded within ongoing schemes of work.
This web-section shows the products of individuals' initiatives on two south London allotment sites. The Introduction below lays out the terms of the activity of improvising and the route via which it loses its innocence and inverts into cuteness and kitsch.
Page 1 shows the allotment "One Tree Hill" (in Honor Oak Park). This is displayed as an informal walk around the site noting interesting/strange objects and formations, especially huts (which are not permitted on the Gun Site allotment).
Page 2 shows the allotment "Gun Site" (in Dulwich). This site's
interesting/strange objects and formations are listed in typological groups.
.
IMPROVISATION
- PRAGMATISM, ART, KITSCH
Naive improvisation cannot achieve a form that has no task to guide it - if it
becomes craft its correlation with the immediate practical task it was serving
to satisfy will no longer be its form's sufficient (and temporary) limit, and
any result less than art (an object that is a complete and independent
experience) will be kitsch. Improvisation produces perfect objects which never
reach a conclusion - never, like art, singular, isolated, finished. Like clouds
they are always in formation - as perfect as the inevitability of their means. An
improvised object cannot be copied, it is a gestalt formed of a practical
response to a need in the context of the easiest and most immediate means. If
its consequent vitality of intelligence and action is admired as appearance, if
its initiator stops making as an act of 'practical-play' and begins to make from
an admiration of 'creativity' and beauty, s/he will loose the 'innocence'
necessary to form perfection with minimum effort, and to regain initiative must
aspire to complete the object for its own sake as art - to do this (like the
cost of the Little Mermaid's possession of legs) s/he must work on resolving a
unique and permanent form beyond admiration, preference, judgment. However this
is rare in societies which depend on mass-marketed products, where individual
intelligence and practical experience is usually applied to choosing/buying
rather than scavenging/improvising (let alone solving ones products as unique
art-works), in fact as soon as object-making becomes 'self-conscious' most
people decant their innate inventiveness/impulses/talents into simply choosing
among mass-aesthetic 'fossil' (kitsch) forms.
Improvisation depends, not so much on 'raw' materials, as discarded parts of manufactured objects: the debris of demolished buildings and broken machines and the primary materials of fabrication trades: boards, sheets, fabrics, containers, formed-wood and metal. A fundamental absurdity [1] of manufacturing/commercial societies is their destruction of these means of improvisational re-use - instead of offering these processed/fabricated objects/materials to resourceful individuals they are dumped out of reach in land fills or reduced by incineration all the way back to their least-differentiated, most-basic raw forms: ash (used in road-surfacing material) and heat (used for power generation).
NOTE :
Not 'absurd' of course to the sellers of newly finished products of manufacture. In "advanced" manufacturing/commercial societies the needs and power of sellers absurdly - in terms of absolute waste of resources from raw to fabricated - dictates destruction (on a vast scale!) of materials that are reusable via resourceful intelligence.
.
ALLOTMENTS
- CONTENT LIMITS
[Written: from 5-2009]
In the UK, improvisatory freedom (unless endorsed as 'art') is legal and tolerated only in very limited types of collectively-utilised publically-visible places. 'Allotments' are such venues - where structures resulting from individuals' improvisatory initiatives can be viewed by strangers, however such structures are required to pertain only to the maintenance of a small patch of horticultural endeavor, limited in size, functional complexity and content to sub-dwelling functions - mainly storage (of the tools of gardening); simple workshop tasks (such as plant propagation); the construction of plant habitats; marginal self-referencing social activities (tiny fragments of 'home', like making tea, having a sitdown rest, admiring ones work). Within such limits UK allotments are places where on one hand the virtue and abilities of practical seriousness is admired, and on the other there is no 'aesthetic' control (except perhaps pragmatism) on invented structures (such as that exercised over the exterior of our homes by officials and 'concerned' neighbours through council planners and via commercially originated conditioning [1]).
NOTE :
It
seems that as soon as a structure's functional category expands to 'home',
individual freedom is curtailed. For example, on the edge of Amsterdam (and
other Netherlands cities) there are allotment-like fenced and gated areas
that host and display mini estates of small dacha-like 'leisure-cottages',
each in its fenced plot of garden-land, that provide for the city's
flat-dwellers a toyland experience of detached-house living. Because the
location is relatively isolated from the city-public's complex and serious
requirements and critiques, it could be a collectively maintained area for
individuals' free inventions, however it seems that the functional level of
a 'home' (which presumably includes its potential sale price) subjects all
the individual dwellings to a collective scrutiny and control similar in
type and degree to that exercised in 'leafy city suburbs' - most of the
structures are stilted, mass-kitsch 'models' of mass-concepts of 'home',
stylised panderings to commercialised mass-taste - all the users of this
facility seem subjected to the whole panoply of social-neighbourhood
interaction: privacy, gossip, wealth/taste display, aesthetic and behavioral
'neighbourly' control. It's as if the rigidity objectivity and
standardisation of the pre-assigned environment - starting with
measured/divided plots served by pedestrian/bike circulation routes and
utility services - automatically catagorizes this escapist 'free-living'
creative opportunity as bourgeois suburbia; it's as if, at the level and
type of functional complexity defined as 'home', there is no general acceptance
of the objective and experiential value of individual personal
inventions (on any level from finance to fulfillment) - only of individual
choices exercised within the mass-market and thus endorsed by the
communality of commercial and familiar products.
.
ALLOTMENTS
- CONTENT TANGENTS & POTENTIALS Established
for the industrial poor or wartime food growing, traditional allotments are
understood to be practical agri-enterprises for cultivating vegetables and fruit
rather than decorative flowering plants, let alone 'aesthetic' layouts and
ornamental garden-like adornments of the plot. However in these times of
easily available food and surplus of energy and time, one sees erosion of the
strictly pragmatic principle along tangents of sterility or inventiveness: Many
allotment plots now include within their rectangular boundary (in addition to a
practical seat for resting after work) a patch that signals 'leisure' -
quite common is a 'quaint' group of log-seats that seem to declare a 'rustic'
discussion-forum; some have a patch of mown lawn, a lily pool, an arbour; a very
few completely transcend the practical and aspire to the artifice of a
'fully-furnished' garden, converting their plot into a sterile mass-culture
'model' with bought in (or neatly copied) 'no-garden-should-be-without'
commercial-kitsch 'features' - an extremity of leisure inclusion that
obliterates the allotment raison d'etre ... fortunately rare, in this last
preserve of (scope-limited but) free inventiveness. Free
inventiveness, socially sanctioned by 'practicality', nevertheless sometimes
exceeds the strictly practical economy of an allotment's purpose and elaborates
pragmatism into 'play'. The latter is characteristic of people who enjoy the
experience/game of inventive improvising as much as sprouting vegetables, who,
without devolving into 'craft' or aspiring to the finality of 'art', gratuitously
invent horticultural uses for arbitrary objects and/or elaborate their practical
constructions via wit.
.
.
"ONE TREE HILL" ALLOTMENT -
HONOR OAK PARK, LONDON, SE23
The whole site is a magnificent 'presentation-venue' for individually-initiated works of construction from practical to whimsy. One Tree Hill is a steepening slope framed in trees - a mini-mountainside presenting specimen works to a vast landscape view.
Though One Tree Hill is a single site (all is accessible from everywhere), there is a tendency - partly because of the ways of convenient paths that follow its topography and established plots, partly the qualities of its users responses to the opportunities of its geography - to experience it as three somewhat separate 'zones'. Thus for convenience I have grouped the pictures into these:
'EAST-ZONE': This lowest eastern strip has collected the richest soil (washed from the site's rising steepness to the west) and hosts the site's most established plots and huts in a line across its level north-south width. Near the centre of its eastern edge is the site's main entrance.
'NORTH-ZONE': Behind the line of E-zone huts the site is narrowed by woodland and begins to steeply rise to the northwest. Plots and huts scatter across the slope and line the poplar-fringed north fence.
'WEST-ZONE': This highest portion of the site continues upwards to a hilltop western fence submerged in trees. As one mounts the hill, the thinning soil, the climb away from services and entry, the lonely vulnerability, are offset by the increasing grandeur of the trees, the sense of solitary enjoyment of the sun-soaked slopes and magnificence of the view. Thus on the higher slopes - before one reaches the hill-top where the view-drama narrows and the dark perimeter trees impinge on the clay discouraging the development of plots - there is a multiplication of sun-catching verandaed 'villa-huts' and terraced and luxuriant gardens.
ONE
TREE HILL - PLAN A consequence of its geography is that I tend to experience the site as three 'zones' of differing character. . |
EAST ZONE
E-ZONE:
DENIS
[11] - SOCIAL SIT PLACE (VER 1) - FROM ENTRY |
E-ZONE:
DENIS
[12] - SOCIAL SIT PLACE (VER 1) - N-END SEAT |
E-ZONE:
DENIS
[13] - SOCIAL SIT PLACE (VER 2) |
E-ZONE:
DENIS
[14] - SOCIAL SIT PLACE (VER 2) |
NORTH ZONE
N-ZONE: PLOTS
& HUTS ON THE NORTH ZONE'S HILLSIDE . |
N-ZONE:
VIEW FROM NEAR THE TOP OF THE NORTH ZONE'S HILL . |
N-ZONE:
BLACK CLEAR-WATER BUTT
[01] |
N-ZONE:
BLACK CLEAR-WATER BUTT
[02]
A
green cloud of blanket-weed floats in the blue sky below the bush-branches. |
N-ZONE:
WOOD-FRAMED SOIL PATCH 'BODY' Its
resemblance to a police-drawn outline of a body on a pavement renders this
carelessly framed patch slightly phantasmagoric. |
N-ZONE:
WATER-TANK WITH BLANKET-WEED
A quite different mode of
agriculture (thankfully contained) than practiced on the earth plots that
surround it. |
N-ZONE:
HUT WITH VERANDA
[01] A standard small hut but for its large window gazing under the shade of an extended, slightly floppy (and thus somewhat hat-like) roof, jauntily supported by three carelessly angled props. . |
N-ZONE:
HUT WITH VERANDA
[02] - VIEW INSIDE |
N-ZONE:
DUMP WITH BARROWS & POND |
N-ZONE:
MARTIN
[01] - HUT, SIT-PLACE & POND A delicate enlargement of a standard small-hut: one side is heightened, a translucent roof is lifted and small windows inserted. . |
N-ZONE:
MARTIN
[02] - HUT, SIT-PLACE & POND . |
N-ZONE:
MARTIN
[03] - HUT OPEN . |
N-ZONE:
WATER-TANK WITH CAPTURED SUN |
N-ZONE:
HUT WITH DOOR-STOP STONES
[01] A
basically simple solution is absurdly
multiplied by 'irrelevant' existential
complexities: the bigger stone, which must lean on a door set rather high
from sloping ground needs its own brick-stop to retard sliding. |
N-ZONE:
HUT WITH DOOR-STOP STONES
[02]
- REAR PLOT The
'door-stop stones hut' is down the hill (right edge of picture). This may
be its associated plot (?) |
N-ZONE:
HUT WITH COWSLIP DELL . |
N-ZONE:
'TINY-HOUSE' HUT
[01]
- PLUS STEPS TO SITE
|
N-ZONE:
'TINY-HOUSE' HUT
[02]
. |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[01] - PLOT FROM PATH ENTRY A
complex of functional places: flower and veg plots, sitting places, two
glasshouses and at the north end, flanking the cemetery fence, her
work-space and an extraordinary 'thrown-together' hut (pics 5~14) (called "Baba
Yaga's" hut
by an observant child).
. |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[02] - FIRST GLASSHOUSE A linear complex of diminishing objects - a form that typically results from need for access. |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[03] - SECOND GLASSHOUSE Sometime
since this picture its balloon-like volume caught the wind and it was
blown away! |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[04]
- SECOND GLASSHOUSE The clarity of its formed purpose is analogous to the products of natural evolution - however in general it differs in the simplicity of its function and in particular its 'instantaneous' physical manufacture. Iris'
improvised hut [below] is also analogous to naturally accreting forms, but
in its mode of growth unlike the 'artificially instantaneous' greenhouse -
however, like the greenhouse it differs from them in the discontinuity of
its 'already-formed' materials. |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[05] - HUT ENTRY FACE Here the 'vague' construction of the hut's rear sides [see pics 9~14 below] is focussed via more differentiated uses and is inevitably more controlled. . |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[06] - SW CORNER |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[07] - HUT ENTRY |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[08] - HUT ENTRY - INTERIOR . |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[09] - REAR OF PLOT - HUT & GLASSHOUSE |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[10]
-
HUT REAR |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[11] - HUT REAR An
astonishingly 'loose' agglomeration of disparate unit-parts that almost as
if by chance, group themselves as 'hut'. The
seemingly manically flung together parts and the undisguised immediacy of
the acts of decision, assembly and fixing, can be subliminally interpreted
as animate: alive movement or a state of decisive potential. |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[12]
- HUT REAR In
the six and a half weeks since the first three pics (ps 9~11) there have been many small
non-structural changes.
|
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[13]
-
HUT REAR (pic 16-4-09 / to S) |
N-ZONE:
IRIS
[14]
- HUT REAR |
WEST ZONE
.
^ Top
> ALLOTMENT - p2: GUN-SITE >
AN ARTIST'S PUBLIC-SITE INSTALLATION WORKS
MPROVISED ARCHITECTURE IN AMSTERDAM INDUSTRIAL SQUATS & COLLECTIVESIMPROVISED OPEN-SITE: ("THE NOMADIC COMMUNITY GARDEN")
IMPROVISED VILLAGES: (WANDSWORTH & KEW BRIDGE 'ECO VILLAGES')
ALLOTMENT IMPROVISATIONS - PUBLIC, LEGAL, SOCIALLY INDORSED
TEMPORARY-ARCHITECTURE: ("FRANK'S CAFE" & "SOUTHWARK LIDO")
VERNACULAR - PRAGMATISM & STYLE: (BERDUN VILLAGE BARNS & HOUSES)
"HOME"
- MY LOCATION VIA MASS-PRODUCTS & TASTE - LIV-RM
"HOME"
- MY LOCATION VIA MASS-PRODUCTS & TASTE - HOUSE
"HOME" - MY LOCATION VIA PERSONAL CHOICES
ART - GOTHIC INTO RENAISSANCE INTO EARLY 20thC
ART
- 20thC COLLAGE INTO MASS-MEDIA
GRAFFITI
INTO STREET-ART
KITSCH
CHANCE
& DESIGN
.